Private Markets
by Frederick R. MacLean

An Exclusive Club Becoming More Inclusive

Private Markets

“I don’t want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member.”

When picturing an investment portfolio, most people tend to gravitate toward the familiar: Blue chip stocks like Microsoft or Walmart, bonds issued by governments or large corporations, or perhaps gold, oil or even cryptocurrency. These investments all share a common feature. They trade in public markets, on exchanges where prices update continuously, and where investors can typically buy or sell with ease.

There is, however, another corner of the investment world, one that most individual investors could not access until fairly recently. Broadly known as the private markets, it functioned like a club and spent decades well outside the everyday investing conversation.

The word private carries a range of associations. It suggests exclusivity, restricted access, opacity, higher costs, and – often – an image of higher quality. In the context of private markets, many of these perceptions have historically been accurate. For much of their existence, private investments were the domain of large institutions and ultra high net worth families. If you were not a pension plan, an endowment, or a part of the financial elite, you were not likely to be invited to the party.

What has changed – and why private markets are getting more attention today – is that this once guarded corner of finance has gradually become more accessible. Access has expanded, minimum investment levels have declined, and new structures have emerged. For individual investors, this is one of the more meaningful shifts in the investment landscape in recent memory.

Private Markets

What Are Private Markets

Private markets involve the opportunity to invest directly in companies, loans, or hard assets that do not trade on public stock or bond exchanges. Typically, these investments are held for long periods and offer fewer opportunities to buy or sell quickly. The simplest way to understand private markets is to contrast them with the public ones.

Renting versus owning: Public market investing is somewhat like renting. Investors can move in or out easily, prices are reset frequently, and while returns may be stronger if the broader environment improves, investors have little influence over outcomes. Private investing feels closer to owning. Capital is committed for longer periods, and investors participate more directly in long term business outcomes. In that sense, private investing is more than just investing in businesses; it’s investing in the ability to improve the businesses over time.

The country club effect: Historically, private investing has been an invitation only endeavor. Fees tend to be much higher, access is more restricted, and information is less transparent than in public markets. Until recently, minimum investments were often measured in millions or even tens of millions of dollars. Over long periods, returns in certain segments of private markets have exceeded those of public markets, reinforcing the appeal of this exclusive club to investors who are on the outside.

The patience premium: Liquidity – the ability to sell quickly – is a defining feature of public markets. In private markets, giving up liquidity is central to the bargain. Investors often commit capital for ten years or longer, with cash flows largely governed by fund managers. Investors are committing more than money; they are also committing time. In exchange, they expect compensation for that patience; accepting short term inconvenience in pursuit of higher long term returns.

What Has Changed

Despite their historically aristocratic image, private markets have become far more accessible over the past decade. Structural innovation has been the most important driver of this shift. New investment vehicles have emerged that look and feel very different from traditional private funds. Instead of committing capital up front and being locked in for many years, some newer structures allow investors to add capital regularly – sometimes monthly or daily – and they offer limited redemption opportunities, often on a quarterly basis. These vehicles remain meaningfully less liquid than public investments, but they provide a degree of flexibility that did not previously exist.

Operational access has also improved. Rather than having to complete extensive subscription documents and hold investments in segregated accounts, many private investments can now be owned within brokerage accounts alongside stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds. Tax reporting has become simpler as well. In certain cases, investors receive a brokerage 1099 instead of waiting months for a K1.

Also, minimum investment levels have fallen sharply. Strategies that once required $10 million or more can now be accessed with $10,000 – or less – bringing private markets within reach of a much broader audience.

This evolution is often labeled, somewhat optimistically, as the “democratization” of
private markets.

But the fundamental characteristics of private investing have not changed. Fees remain high, transparency remains limited, and liquidity is still constrained. While access has become easier, the underlying risks, trade offs, and commitments remain.

A Few Important Realities

Private markets are not for everyone, and they were never designed to be. They require a genuinely long term mindset, emotional discipline, and comfort with uncertainty, along with a clear understanding of liquidity risk. Unlike public investments, private investments do not always allow investors to easily change course later. Once capital is committed, patience is mandatory.

But when used thoughtfully and in moderation by the right investor, private investments can play a constructive role in a well diversified portfolio. They offer exposure to parts of the economy that public markets do not fully capture, and they may reward investors willing to accept high fees, complexity, illiquidity, and long investment horizons. If used without sufficient planning or understanding, though, they can just as easily lead to frustration, disappointment, or regret. The key question is not whether private markets are sophisticated, popular, or increasingly accessible. It is whether they are appropriate for a given investor.

The most important question you can ask is not what private markets might deliver for you, but what are you truly prepared to live with over time? That question, more than any headline or buzzword, ultimately determines whether private markets belong in your
portfolio.